Reboots, Revivals, and TV’s Favourite Habit: Coming Back Like Nothing Happened
(Prefer to listen rather than scroll? Here is the audio version of the post.)
We need to talk about reboots.
Because what television keeps calling a reboot… often isn’t one.
Traditionally, a reboot means starting again from scratch. Same title, new cast, new story, no obligation to what came before. Think of the new The X-Files project being developed by Ryan Coogler. No David Duchovny, no Gillian Anderson, and possibly no Mulder and Scully at all.
That’s a reboot.
What we’re seeing more of now is something else entirely.
Same cast. Same characters. Same world.
Just… older. Slightly creakier. With better lighting and worse knees.
That’s not a reboot. That’s a revival.
And TV is currently obsessed with them.
The Original Revival Blueprint
This isn’t new.
Will & Grace did it back in 2017, eleven years after it ended. Not only did it bring everyone back, it looked directly at its own finale and said, “Let’s just… ignore that.”
There was actual exposition explaining why the original ending didn’t count. Jack McFarland basically turned to the audience and told us to get over it.
And we did.
Kind of.
It never quite reached the heights of the original run, but three extra seasons is nothing to sniff at. It worked because the chemistry was still there, even if the spark wasn’t quite as chaotic as before.
Then came Roseanne.
When Revival Becomes Survival
Roseanne returned in 2018 and pulled a similar trick. It quietly erased the original ending so that John Goodman could come back as Dan Connor. No explanation. Just… he’s alive. Move on.
And honestly, no one complained.
The real surprise wasn’t that it worked. It was how good the cast were. Sharper. More grounded. More comfortable in their skin.
Apart from the titular star.
After some very public off-screen issues, Roseanne Barr was written out entirely. The show pivoted into The Conners, led by Goodman and Laurie Metcalf, and quietly became one of the most stable long-running sitcoms on US TV. Seven seasons.
Which makes the UK only getting five even more annoying. Sort it out, streamers.
The Cult Comeback
Then you have shows like Party Down.
Originally running from 2009 to 2010, it was never massive, but it was loved. The kind of show people recommend with the intensity of someone trying to convert you to a niche religion.
It came back in 2023 for a third season and, crucially, it worked. Critics liked it. Audiences liked it. It didn’t feel like a cynical cash grab.
As of now, there’s no confirmed fourth season. It hasn’t been officially cancelled either, which in TV terms means it’s sitting in that awkward “maybe if schedules align and someone finds a budget down the back of the sofa” phase.
So… not dead. Just loitering.
When It Doesn’t Quite Work
Now we need to talk about Arrested Development.
One of the most inventive comedies ever made. Three near-perfect seasons. Then Netflix brought it back.
On paper, what they did was clever. The cast were now huge stars, so they couldn’t film together. The solution? Tell the same story from different characters’ perspectives across separate episodes.
Structurally, quite genius.
Comedically… less so.
Because the magic of Arrested Development was never just the writing. It was the chaos of those characters colliding in the same room.
Take that away and you’re left with something interesting, but not quite right.
They later recut it into a more traditional format, which tells you everything you need to know.
There was another season in 2018 with the added complication of behind-the-scenes issues, with Jessica Walter publicly calling out Jeffrey Tambor for bullying. Which didn’t exactly help the warm, nostalgic glow. It’s a shame.
The “We Didn’t Need This… But I’m Glad It Exists” Category
This is where Frasier sits.
My favourite sitcom of all time, returning nineteen years later.
Was it as good as the original?
No.
Was it good?
Yes. And that’s more than most revivals manage.
Frasier Crane in his third act of life was something I didn’t know I needed. There was no Niles, which still feels slightly criminal, but Nicholas Lyndhurst as Alan was inspired casting. A proper foil. Someone who could match Frasier’s ego and puncture it when needed.
And the father-son dynamic flipped nicely. Frasier now dealing with Freddy, who has turned into a version of Martin Crane with a fire hose.
By the end of season two, it had found its rhythm.
Which, of course, was when it was cancelled. I say this with complete sincerity.
F**k you, Paramount+.
The 2026 Nostalgia Surge
And now we’re fully in it.
Scrubs is back, with JD and Turk stepping into senior roles. It’s not trying to recreate what it was. It’s letting the characters age into something new, which is exactly what a revival should do.
Malcolm in the Middle has returned with Malcolm still being both the smartest and most ridiculous person in the room. Some things, thankfully, never change.
And then there’s The Comeback.
Which might be the most fitting example of all.
Valerie Cherish has already come back once. Cancelled in 2005. Revived in 2014. And now returning again in 2026. A show about a woman who can’t quite let go of fame… refusing to let go of existence. There’s something beautifully on-the-nose about that.
At the time of writing, I haven’t seen the new season. But if history tells us anything, it will be uncomfortable, painfully self-aware, and probably brilliant.
So Why Now?
Is this all nostalgia?
Partly.
We’ve come out of a period where comfort TV became essential viewing. People rewatched old favourites because they knew what they were getting. No surprises. No risk. Just something familiar.
But it’s also about money.
Revivals are safer bets. Built-in audiences. Recognisable brands. Less marketing effort required.
In an industry that is increasingly risk-averse, that matters.
A lot.
But Should Everything Come Back?
No. Absolutely not.
Some shows are perfect because they ended when they should have.
I never want to see a new Cheers. Or Friends.
Leave them alone. Let them be brilliant in their own time.
Not everything needs a second act. Or a third. Or, in some cases, a slightly desperate fourth.
That said…
I do have a very good idea for a The Golden Girls reboot.
And if anyone in the industry happens to be reading this, I’m available.
The Real Difference
So here’s the key distinction.
A reboot replaces.
A revival continues.
And the difference matters because the audience expectation is completely different.
With a reboot, we’re open to something new.
With a revival, we’re not.
We want the same feeling. The same characters. The same magic.
Just… updated.
And that’s incredibly hard to pull off.
Because you’re not just competing with today’s television.
You’re competing with memory.
Over to You
I’ve definitely missed some. Probably quite a few.
So what would you bring back?
And more importantly…
What should TV just leave alone?
You may also like:
Top Ten Studio Sitcoms: The American Invasion
Glossy, gag-packed, and iconic — from Cheers to Friends, here are ten American studio sitcoms that Britain loved (and still rewatches).
Top Ten Smartest Comedies That Still Managed to Be Funny
Who says smart can’t be funny? From Blackadder to Fleabag, here are ten clever comedies that prove brains and belly laughs can coexist beautifully.
Ten Comedy Moments That Stepped Out of Line (and Changed Everything)
From Mac’s dance to Blackadder’s final charge, ten sitcom episodes that broke format, shifted tone, and changed what TV comedy could do.
Read more blogs by clicking here.
Comedy Through the Cracks
A free exclusive PDF essay.
If life keeps cracking at the edges, you might as well laugh at the draft.
Comedy Through the Cracks is my short, honest take on why comedy endures — and why we need it when we’re one awkward moment away from combusting.
Download it here to remember why humour endures (and why we need it more than ever).
